Volume 1, Issue 1 (12-2015)                   J. Hum. Environ. Health Promot. 2015, 1(1): 49-55 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

saghatchi F, jafari F, Alizadeh Shirazi F, Khatibi F, Bigdeli A. Study of Screening Mammography Frequency and Related Variables in Women Referring to the Mammography Center, Mousavi Hospital, Zanjan. J. Hum. Environ. Health Promot.. 2015; 1 (1) :49-55
URL: http://zums.ac.ir/jhehp/article-1-29-en.html
1- Department of Radiology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
2- Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
3- Department of Laboratory Sciences, School of Paramedical Sciences, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
4- Department of Radiology, Mousavi Hospital, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
5- Ayatollah Mousavi Hospital, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
Abstract:   (1911 Views)

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer found in women, and screening is the best way to make an early diagnosis. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of screening mammography and related variables in the mammography center of Mousavi Hospital, located in Zanjan, Iran.
Methods: This was a prospective descriptive study. Study sample size was 526 women who were selected by a convenience sampling method. Data collection instrument was a multi-section questionnaire and this was completed by a trained radiology technologist through interviews. In cases referred to ultrasonography or histopathological evaluation, follow-up of the women was conducted to obtain their results.

Results: Results showed that the rate of screening mammography was 27.4%. Educated women and women, who had a family history of breast cancer, were more likely to have a screening mammography. Among the referrals, 71% were between the age of 30-50 years and the most common complaint in the diagnostic mammography patients was breast pain. The findings of mammography in 33% of patients were normal, 2.3% were malignant and the rest of the cases were as follows: dense breast, axillary lymph node, benign mass, fibrocystic breast and calcification. For the women who had a further evaluation; 26% were referred to ultrasonography, and 1.4% were referred for a breast biopsy. The findings of ultrasonography and pathology confirmed malignancy in 4 women.
Conclusion: According to the study’s results, there is a need to provide information and mass education about screening mammography, breast cancer risk factors and symptoms in Zanjan.

Full-Text [PDF 240 kb]   (293 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2015/11/7 | Accepted: 2015/11/30 | Published: 2016/01/20

References
1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer Statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009; 59(4):225-49. [Crossref]
2. Berlin L. Breast Cancer, Mammography, and Malpractice Litigation: the Controversies Continue. AJR. 2003; 180(5):1229-37. [Crossref]
3. Scott JR, Gibbs RS, Karlan BY, Haney AF. Danforth’s Obstetrics and Gynecology, 9th Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.
4. Keith LG, Oleszczuk JJ, Laguens M. Are Mammography and Palpation Sufficient for Breast Cancer Screening? A Dissenting Opinion. J Women's Health Gend Based Med. 2002; 11(1):17-25. [Crossref]
5. Bassett LW, Ysrael M, Gold RH, Ysrael C. Usefulness of Mammography and Sonography in Women Less than 35 Years of Age. Radiology. 1991; 180(3): 831-5. [Crossref]
6. Bombardieri E, Crippa F. PET Imaging in Breast Cancer. Q J Nucl Med Molecular Imaging. 2001; 45(3): 245.
7. Lado M, Tahoces PG, Méndez AJ, Souto M, Vidal JJ. Evaluation of an automated Wavelet-Based System Dedicated to the Detection of Clustered Microcalcifications in Digital Mammograms. Inform Health Social Care. 2001; 26(3): 149-63.
8. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL. Efficacy of Screening Mammography: A Meta-Analysis. JAMA. 1995; 273(2):149-54. [Crossref]
9. American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer. Available from: URL: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_2_3X_ACS_Cancer_Detection_Guidelines_36.asp. 2011.
10. Thurfjell E, Hsieh CC, Lipworth L, Ekbom A, Adami HO, Trichopoulos D. Breast Size and Mammographic Pattern in Relation to Breast Cancer Risk. European J Cancer Prevention. 1996; 5(1):37-41.
11. Endo T. Mammograohic Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Gan to Kagaku Ryoho.1996; 23(2): 650-53.
12. Fleischer AC, Muhletaler CA, Reynolds VH, Machin JE, Thieme GA, Bundy AL, et al. Palpable Breast Masses, Evaluation with High Frequency- Real time Sonography and Xero Mammography. Radiology. 1983; 148(3): 813-7. [Crossref]
13. Mohagheghi MA, Musavi Jarrahi A, Zaraati H. Annual report of the Imam Khomeini Medical Center hospital based cancer registry, The Cancer Institute publication.1998.
14. Bland KI, Vezeridis MP, Copeland EM. Breast. In: Schwartz SI, Shires GT, Spencer FC, Daly JM, Fischer JE, Galloway AC (Editors). Principles of Surgery. 7th ed. Mc-Graw Hill. 1999: 533-600.
15. Harirchi I, Ebrahimi M, Zamani N, Jarvandi S, Montazeri A. Breast Cancer in Iran: a Review of 903 Case Records. Public Health. 2000; 114(2): 143-5. [Crossref]
16. Jarvandi S, Montazeri A, Harirchi I, Kazemnejad AN. Beliefs and Behaviors of Iranian Teachers toward Early Detection of Breast Cancer and Breast Self-Examination. Public Health. 2002; 116(4):245-9. [Crossref]
17. Khalegnejad Tabari N, Khalegnejad Tabari A. The Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Behavior towards Breast Cancer Screening Methods among Female Teachers in Tehran. Iran J Surgery. 2008; 16(1): 46-54. [In Persian].
18. Godazandeh GH.A, Khani H, Khalilian A.R, Âtarod Z, Firozjaee M.A, Partovi A, et al. Knowledge and practice of above 15 years old females towards breast cancer prevention in Sari township, 2004. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2006; 16(52): 64-76. [In Persian].
19. Sina A, Jalil A, Abdi B, Ghara Aghaji R. Study of Mammographic Findings and Correlation of Breast Tumors with the Pathological Results in Imam Khomeini Hospital Urmia. J Urmia Univ Med Sci. 2002; 13(3): 213-19.
20. Maleki D. The Demographic Characteristic and Clinical Presentation of Patients with Breast Cancer in Urmia, Which Screening Program may be Appropriate? J Urmia Univ Med Sci. 2010; 21(3): 273-77. [In Persian].
21. Hoseini M. Perceived Risk and Determinants of Breast Cancer Screening in Employed Women of Ilam. Medical Thesis. Ilam Univ Med Sci Med School. 2005. [In Persian].
22. Abedzadeh M, Sadat Z, Saberi F. Knowledge, attitude, and Performance of Women Referring Health Care Centers in Kashan towards Breast Cancer and its Screening Tests. Feyz. 2003; 7(2): 59-64.
23. Ghazanfari Z, Mohammad Alizadeh S, Ezzat Talab F. Knowledge, attitude and Practice of Employed Women in Chaloos about Breast Cancer Prevention. J Shaheed Sadoughi Univ Med Sci. 2006; 14(2): 44-50. [In Persian].
24. Banaeian S, Kazemian A, Kheiri S. Knowledge, attitude and Practice about Breast Cancer Screening and Related Factors among Women Referred to Health Care Centers in Boroujen in 2005. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci. 2006; 7 (4): 28-34. [In Persian].
25. Mahouri K, Sadeghi HA, Talei A. Knowledge and Practice about Breast Cancer Screening among Women Referred to Health Care Centers in Shiraz. Hormozgan Med J. 2004; 7(2): 68-75. [In Persian].
26. Rutledge DN, Barsevick A, Knobf MT, Bookbinder M. Breast Cancer Detection: Knowledge, attitudes, and Behaviors of Women from Pennsylvania. In Oncology Nursing Forum. 2001; 28(6): 1032-40.
27. Farshbaf Khalili A, Shahnazi M, Ghahvechi A, Torabi Sh. Performance Conditions of Breast Cancer Screening Methods and its Efficient Factors among Women Referring to Health Centers of Tabriz. Iran J Nursing Res. 2010; 4(13): 27-38. [In Persian].
28. Katapodi MC, Lee KA, Facione NC, Dodd MJ. Predictors of Perceived Breast Cancer Risk and the Relation between Perceived Risk and Breast Cancer Screening: a Meta-Analytic Review. Preventive Med. 2004; 38(4): 388-402. [Crossref]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

Send email to the article author


© 2018 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Human, Environment and Health Promotion

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb