Volume 2, Issue 3 (6-2017)                   J. Hum. Environ. Health Promot. 2017, 2(3): 147-153 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Pouyakian M, Farhadi R, Jafari M J, Zarei F. Evaluation of the Explosion Hazard of a 1-Butene Tank in a Polymer Complex Based on Consequence Analysis. J. Hum. Environ. Health Promot.. 2017; 2 (3) :147-153
URL: http://zums.ac.ir/jhehp/article-1-104-en.html
1- Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Abstract:   (746 Views)

Background: Nowadays, the reduction of incidents, their effects and their consequences have become one of the priorities of organizations. Despite all the efforts made in various sectors to reduce events, every year, there are many events that threaten industrial societies. In order to mitigate the effects of these incidents, prediction and planning are critical to dealing with them. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of explosion of 1-butane reservoir in a polymer complex based on an analysis of the outcome using the PHAST software.
Methods: This study was conducted in one of the Kermanshah petrochemical complexes in 2016. Necessary geographic information and other basic information were collected. 16 probable scenarios were selected and consequences modeling was done by PHAST software.
Results: The modeling results showed that full rupture scenarios and leakage scenarios from the 150 mm hole are the most dangerous scenarios.
Conclusion: The results of modeling showed that the larger the leakage size, the associated consequences would be more dangerous and consequently more losses. Due to the capabilities of studied company and the readiness level of the company, it has the ability to respond to the first scenario to some extent.

 

Full-Text [PDF 384 kb]   (184 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/04/19 | Accepted: 2017/05/27 | Published: 2017/06/20

References
1. Abdolhamidzade B, Badri N. Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment in the Process Industries. Thran: Andishehsara. 1392.
2. Center for Chemical Process Safety. In: Guidelines for Technical Planning for on-Site Emergencies. 2nd ed. New York; 1995: 192.
3. Ikhardsson PM, Impgaard M. The Cost of Company Occupational Accidents: An Activity-Based Analysis Using the SACA Method. Am Soc Saf Eng. 2002.
4. Selwyn L. Health and Safety Concerns Relating to Lead and Lead Compounds in Conservation. J Can Association Conserv. 2005; 30: 18-37.
5. Material Safety Data Sheet. Available from: URL: https://www.sciencelab.com/msdsList.php.
6. Material Safety Data Sheet. Available from: URL: http://www.lindeus.com/en/index.html.
7. HSE Convey, a Second Report. A Review of Potential Hazards from Operations in the Convey Island/Turlock Area Three Years after Publication of the Convey Report, HMSO. 1981.
8. Storage Tank. Available from: URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storage_tank.
9. Normohamadi T. Vulnerability Buildings Against Increased Pressure Caused by the Explosion of Cloudy Vapor. Available from: URL:http://www.aipceco.com/index.php/fa/informaition-system/archive/211-2016-01-04-06-48-26.
10. Golbabaei F, Noredin F, Fam E. Modeling Propane leakage Emissions in an Industry. Hum Environ J. Available from: URL: http://hesrbiauacir/article_3404_709html. 2012; 20: 1-13. [In Persian].
11. Nicholas C. PHAST User Manual, DNV Software. 2001.
12. Vinnem JE, Pedersen JI, Rosenthal P. Efficient Risk Management: Use of Computerized QRA Model for Safety Improvements to an Existing Installation. SPE Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Conference. Soc Pet Eng. 1996.
13. Mohammadfam I. Safety Engineering. Tehran: Fanavaran Publication; 2011.
14. Golichi E, Karbasei A, Tabrizian Sh. Development of Crisis Management and Emergency Response in the Oil, Gas and Petrochemical. Second National Conference on Crisis Management and HSE in the Arteries of life, Industry and Urban Management, Tehran. Permanent Secretariat of the National Conference on Crisis Management and HSE. 2014.
15. Ennis T. Development of Source Terms for Gas Dispersion and Vapour Cloud Explosion Modelling. IChemE. 2006: 151-14.
16. Kashi E, Nasehpour S, Kareshki H. Accident Consequence Analysis Processes in Refineries. 2th Natl Conference Health Saf Environ. 2013. [In Persian].
17. Behrouzi H, Askarian M. Margin of Safety to Extract Gas Pressure Reduction Stations in Result of Explosion and Fire Consequences. Inspection and Safety Conference. 2012.
18. Jahangiri M, Norouzi MA. Management and Risk Assessment; Quantitative Assessment of Risks in the Process Industry. Theran: Fanavaran Publication. 1392: 2-10. [In Persian].
19. Jafari M, Mohammadfam I, Zarei E. Analysis and Simulation of Severe Accidents in a Steam Methane Reforming Plant. Int J Occup Hyg. 2015; 6(3):120-30.
20. Mortazavi SB. Evaluation of Chlorine Dispersion from Storage Unit in a Petrochemical Complex to Providing an Emergency Response Program. Iran Occup Health. 2011; 8(3).
21. Jafari MJ, Zarei E, Dormohammadi A. Provide a Method for Modeling and Evaluating the Consequences of a Risk of Fire and Explosion in the Process Industries (A Case Study of Hydrogen Production Process). J Occup Saf Health. 2012; 3(1).
22. Dorofeey S. Evaluation of Safety Distances Related to Unconfined Hydrogen Explosions. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2007; 32(13): 2118-24.
23. Ataby F, Narmin Nejad A, Khoshgard A. Modeling Sudden Release of Ammonia from Storage Tanks and Emergency Response Plan. 1392. [In Persian].

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author


© 2018 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Human, Environment and Health Promotion

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb