Volume 2, Issue 4 (9-2017)                   J. Hum. Environ. Health Promot. 2017, 2(4): 253-260 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abedi Z, Mehrasbi M R, Assadi A. Adsorption of Humic Acid On Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. J. Hum. Environ. Health Promot.. 2017; 2 (4) :253-260
URL: http://zums.ac.ir/jhehp/article-1-122-en.html
1- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
Abstract:   (325 Views)
Background: Natural organic matters (NOMs) have the main role in formation of trihalomethanes. These compounds are in natural water sources due to biological activities. In the presented study, adsorption and separation of humic acid as an index of natural organic matters using multi-walled carbon nanotubes is evaluated.
Methods: The experiments were carried out in bath adsorption reactors with different concentrations of humic acid. The effects of pH, adsorbent dose, national concentrations of humic acid and contact time as study variables were tested in separated experiments, as well as, kinetic and isotherm models of the adsorption process were determined.
Results: The results showed that the adsorption follows Freundlich isotherm model and pseudo second-order kinetic equation. The removal percent of humic acid reached to higher than 90% with dosage of 1g/l of nanotube.
Conclusion: Adsorption of humic acid from water by multi-walled carbon nanotubes is an efficient alternative pretreatment method in water treatment plants.
 
Full-Text [PDF 458 kb]   (61 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/06/6 | Accepted: 2017/08/1 | Published: 2017/09/21

References
1. Naddeo V, Belgiorno V, Napoli MAR. Behavior of Natural Organic Matter during Ultrasonic Irradiation. Desalination. 2007; 210: 175-82.
2. Besop A, Iborra CA, Mendoza FA, Iborra CM, Alcaina MI. Nanofilteration of Biologically Treated Textile Effluents Using Ozone as a Pre-Treatment. Desalination. 2004; 167: 387-92.
3. Wang YH, Zhu JL, Zhso CG, Zhang JC. Removal of Trace Organic Compounds from Wastewater by Ultrasonic Enhancement on Adsorption. Desalination. 2005; 186: 89-96.
4. AWWA, APHA, WEF. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th Ed; Am Public Health Assoc / Am Water Work Assoc / Water Environ Federation, Washington D.C; USA; 1998.
5. Wyman CF. Ethanol Rrom Lignocellulosic Biomass: Technology Economics and Opportunities. Biores Technol. 1994; 50: 3-5.
6. Dalla Rocca C, Belgiorno V, Meric S. Cotton Supported Heterotrophic Denitrification of Nitrate Rich Drinking Water with a Sand Filtration Post- Treatment. Water SA. 2005; 31(2): 229-36.
7. Clark RM, Adams JQ, Lynkins BW. DBP Control in Drinking Water: Cost and Performance. J Environ Eng. 1994; 120(4): 759-82.
8. Rook JJ. Haloforms in Drinking Water. J Am Water Works Assoc. 1976; 68: 168-72.
9. Omaha. Hand Book of Public Systems. HDR Engineering, Inc: John Wilet and Sons; 2001.
10. Crittenden JRR, Trussel D, Tchobanoglous G. Water Treatment Principles and Design. John Wiley: New York; 2005.
11. Aiken G, Evangelo C. Soil and Hydrology, Their Effects of NOM. J Am Water Works Assoc. 1996; 1: 36-7.
12. Noyes R. Hand Book Pollution Control Processes. NDC; 1991.
13. Mileta P. NOM and Arsenic Removal from Natural Water by Enhanced Coagulation. E-Water. 2006: 1-10.
14. Malgorzata KK. Effect of Al Coagulant Type on Natural Organic Mater Removal Efficiency in Coagulation/Ultrafilteration Process. Desalination. 2005; 185(1-3): 327-33.
15. Odegaard H, Eikebrokk B, Storhang R. Process for the Removal of Humic Substances from Water- an Overview Based on Norvegian Experiences. J Water Sci Tech. 1999; 40(9): 37-46.
16. Saltnes T, Eikebrokk B, Odegaard H. Contact Filtration of Humic Waters Performance of an Expanded Clay Aggregate Filter (Fltration) Compared to a Dual Anthracite/Sand Filter. J Water Sci Tech. 2002; 2(5-6): 17-23.
17. Ehrampoush M, Mahvi A, Fallahzadeh H, Moussavi S. The Evaluation of Efficiency of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Humic Acid Adsorption in Acidic Conditions from Aqueous Solution. TB. 2013; 11 (3): 79-90.
18. Chow CWK, Leeuwen JA, Drikas M, Fabris R, Spark KM, Page DW. The Impact of the Character of Natural Organic Matter in Conventional Treatment with Alum. Water Sci Technol. 1999; 40(9): 97-104.
19. Fernando MM, Carlos PB, Fernando HM. Thais, et al. Adsorption of Reactive Red M-2BE by from Water Solution by Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Activated Carbon. J Hazard Mater. 2011; 192: 1122-31.
20. Dehghani M H, Alimohammadi M, Mahvi A H, Rastkari N, Mostofi M, Gholami M. Performance of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes for Removal Phenol from Aqueous Solutions. IJHE. 2014; 6 (4): 491-502.
21. Chungsying Lu, Fengsheng Su. Adsorption of Natural Organic Matter by Carbon Nanotubes. Sep Purif Technol. 2007; 58: 113-21.
22. Sulak MT, Demirbas E, Kobya M. Removal of Astrazon Yellow 7GL from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption onto wheat Bran. Biores Technol. 2007; 13; 2590-8.
23. Naghizadeh A, Nasseri S. Survey of Reformed Continuous Flow Carbon Nanotubes Column Efficiency in Removal of Natural Organic Matters from Aqueous Solution. IJHE. 2015; 8 (2): 171-80.
24. Ozbay, Yargic AS, Yarbay-Shahin RZ, Onal E. Full Factorial Experimental Design Analysis of Reactive Dye Removal by Carbon Adsorption. J Chem. 2013; ID234904: 1-13.
25. Asgari G, Rasoli L, Mohammadi AS. Survey of Performance of Modified Zeolite with hexadecyltrimethylammonium Bromide for Removal of Humic Acids from Aqueous Solutions. 12th Natl Conf of Environ Health, Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci Tehran. 2009.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author


© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Human, Environment and Health Promotion

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb