Volume 2, Issue 2 (3-2017)                   J. Hum. Environ. Health Promot. 2017, 2(2): 112-117 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


1- Department of Health, Safety & Environment Management, School of Public Health, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
2- Department of Occupational Health Engineering and Department of Health, Safety & Environment Management, Zanjan Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
3- Department of Occupational Health Engineering and Department of Health, Safety & Environment Management, School of Public Health, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
Abstract:   (953 Views)

Background: Rapid pace of the construction projects have led to safety negligence on the part of the contractors causing higher numbers of accidents in construction industry. Thus, over 2200 legal provisions have been established for the prevention of accidents on construction sites. Not only contractors are unable to implement all provisions, but also it is hard for regulatory bodies to implement all rules, but they are also hard to remember and attend to by regulatory forces. Therefore, identifying the set of codes with the highest effect on reducing accidents would be most beneficial. The aim of this study was to determine the most effective legal provisions in reducing accidents on construction sites in Zanjan city.

Methods: In this study, 378 work-related accidents in construction sites in Zanjan city, already registered in the Labor Inspection Authority, were investigated .Then the codes that had not been respected in the construction industry accidents were identified. Effective codes were determined based on their frequency on Pareto chart.

Results: Results indicated that out of 2200 legal matters, only 164 were broken in the accidents.

Conclusion: Application of Pareto chart could raise safety professionals' awareness of the specific broken codes in accidents, thus draw higher attention to the codes.

Full-Text [PDF 385 kb]   (317 Downloads)    
Subject: Special
Received: 2016/11/26 | Accepted: 2017/01/25 | Published: 2017/03/20

References
1. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Industries at a Glance: Construction Naics 23. 2014. Available from: URL: http://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag23.htm.
2. Olson R, Varga A, Cannon A, Jones J, Gilbert-Jones I, Zoller E. Toolbox Talks to Prevent Construction Fatalities: Empirical Development and Evaluation. Saf Sci. 2016; 86: 122-31.
3. Lockyer C, Scholarios D. The “Rain Dance” of Selection in Construction: Rationality as Ritual and the Logic of Informality. Per Rev. 2007; 36(4): 528-48.
4. Hui L, Yongqing W, Shimei S, Baotie S. Study on safety assessment of fire hazard for the construction site. Procedia Engineering. 2012; 43: 369-73.
5. The National Examination Board in Occupational Safety and Health. What’s more deadly, construction work or armed conflict, 2014. Available from: URL: https://www.nebosh.org.uk/news/default.asp,cref = 816&ct=2.
6. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Fatal Occupational Injuries, Total Hours Worked, and Rates of Fatal Occupational Injuries by Selected Worker Characteristics, Occupations, and Industries, Civilian Workers. 2012. Available from: URL: http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfoi_rates_2012hb.pdf.
7. Esabati M. Safety Recommendations of Construction Inspection Director for Land Preparation and Excavation Phases. Ministry of Labor & Social Affair, Iran. 2012. Available from: URL: http://bazresikar mcls gov ir/fa/home/tosieeme ni.
8. Sousa V, Almeida NM, Dias LA. Risk-Based Management of Occupational Safety and Health in the Construction Industry – Part 1: Background knowledge. Saf Sci. 2014; 66(0): 75-86.
9. Halvani G, Jafarinodoushan R, Mirmohammadi S, Mehrparvar A. A Survey on Occupational Accidents among Construction Industry Workers in Yazd city: Applying Time Series 2006-2011. J Occup Health Epidemiol. 2012; 1(1): 1-8.
10. Arghami Sh, Kamali K, Mahboubi M. Development of a Fire Safety Checklist for Dormitories. J Hum Environ Health Promot. 2016; 2(1): 20-31.