Volume 2, Issue 2 (3-2017)                   J. Hum. Environ. Health Promot 2017, 2(2): 79-88 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Farahmandkia Z, Moattar F, Zayeri F, Sekhavatjou M S, Mansouri N. Evaluation of Cancer Risk of Heavy Metals in the Air of a High Traffic Urban Region and Its Source Identification. J. Hum. Environ. Health Promot. 2017; 2 (2) :79-88
URL: http://zums.ac.ir/jhehp/article-1-99-en.html
1- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
2- Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Environment and Energy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3- Proteomics Research Center and Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4- Department of Environmental Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch, Ahvaz, Khouzestan, Iran.
Abstract:   (3271 Views)

Background: Sampling was conducted on particles smaller than ten microns (PM10) in a high-traffic urban region once a week for two years in which fifteen heavy metals were measured.

Methods: positive matrix factorization (EPA-PMF5), was used for source apportionment and characterization of the collected PM10. Assessment of cancer risk resulting from metals including arsenic, cadmium, chromium, nickel and lead was conducted in three concentration ranges of maximum, average and minimum.

Results: Results for children and adults living in the region indicated that cancer risk indexes at different concentration ranges of carcinogenic metals were between 10-4 to 10-6 for adults and children. Since EPA recommendations suggest that planning should be conducted if cancer risk is in the range of 10-4 to 10-6, using PMF5 model, source characterization of pollutants was implemented by all measured heavy metals.

Conclusion: It was found that 41.5% of PM10 resulted from fuel and combustion, 12% from waste dump soil of lead and zinc industries, 35.7% from suspended open soil and 11% from industrial activities. It was also found that cadmium, nickel and, chromium have higher cancer risk than other metals and, suspended open soil, industrial activities and industrial fuel and combustion are the main sources of these metals respectively.

Full-Text [PDF 517 kb]   (770 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Public Health
Received: 2016/12/6 | Accepted: 2017/02/5 | Published: 2017/03/20

1. Cancer, IAfRO, IARC: Outdoor Air Pollution a Leading Environmental Cause of Cancer Deaths. Int Agency Res Cancer. 2013.
2. AL-Khashman OA. Determination of Metal Accumulation in Deposited Street Dusts in Amman, Jordan. Environ Geochem Health. 2007; 29(1): 1-10. [Crossref]
3. Yongming H, Peixuan D, Junji C, Posmentier EC. Multivariate Analysis of Heavy Metal Contamination in Urban Dusts of Xi'an, Central China. Sci Total Environ. 2006; 355(1): 176-86. [Crossref]
4. Air Quality Guidelines for Europe (WHO). United Nations Environ Programme Document Repository. 2000.
5. Health and Environment in Europe (WHO). Progress Assessment. 2010.
6. Tariq SR, Shah MH, Shaheen N, Khalique A, Manzoor S, Jaffar M. Multivariate Analysis of Trace Metal Levels in Tannery Effluents in Relation to Soil and Water: A Case Study from Peshawar, Pakistan. J Environ Manag. 2006; 79(1): 20-9. [Crossref]
7. Farahmandkia Z, Mehrasbi MR, Sekhavatjou M. Relationship between Concentrations of Heavy Metals in Wet Precipitation and Atmospheric PM^ Sub 10^ Particles in Zanjan, Iran. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2011; 8(1): 49.
8. Mohammadian M, Nouri J, Afshari N, Nasiri J, Nourani M. An Investigation on Heavy Metals Concentration in Zinc and lead Factories at Adjacent Water Wells. Environ Health Quart. 2008; 1(1): 51-6.
9. Sohrabi MR. Investigation of Reservoir Water Quality of Tahm Dam and Identification of Pollution Source. 16th Conference on National Health Tabriz Univ Med Sci. 2013.
10. Parizanganeh A, Hajisotani P, Zamani A. Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Surficial Soils Surrounding Zinc Industrial Complex in Zanjan-Iran. Procedia Environ Sci. 2010; 2: 162-6. [Crossref]
11. Zamani AA, Yaftian MR, Parizanganeh A. Heavy Metal Contamination of Water and Soil Analysis, Assessment, and Remediation Strategies. Apple Academic Prss, Toronto: New Jersey; 2014.
12. Poorjafari N, Zamani A, Mohseni M, Parizanganeh A. Assessment of Residue Melamine in Dairy Products Exhibited in Zanjan Market, Iran by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2015; 12(3): 1003-10. [Crossref]
13. Saba G, Parizanganeh AH, Zamani A. Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals Contaminated Environments: Screening for Native Accumulator Plants in Zanjan-Iran. Int J Environ Res. 2015; 9(1): 309-16.
14. Sadovska V. Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals Adsorbed in Particulates. Int Sch Sci Res Innov. 2012; 6(8): 481-4.
15. Park EJ, Kim DS, Park K. Monitoring of Ambient Particles and Heavy Metals in a Residential Area of Seoul, Korea. Environ Monit Assess. 2008; 137(1-3): 441-9. [Crossref]
16. Khanna I, Khare M, Gargava P. Health Risks Associated with Heavy Metals in Fine Particulate Matter: A case Study in Delhi City, India. J Geosci Environ Prot.2015; 3(02): 72. [Crossref]
17. Hieu NT, Lee BK. Characteristics of Particulate Matter and Metals in the Ambient Air from a Residential Area in the Largest Industrial City in Korea. Atmos Res. 2010; 98(2): 526-37. [Crossref]
18. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Process for conducting Probabilistic Risk Assessment (Part A). USEPA: Washington, DC, USA. 2001; 3: EPA 540-R-02002.
19. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A). USEPA: Washington, DC, USA. 1989; 1: EPA /540/1-89/002.
20. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part F, Supplemental Guidance for Inhalation Risk Assessment). Washington, DC. 2009; EPA-540-R-070-002-OSWER9285.7-82.
21. Paatero P. Least Squares Formulation of Robust Non-Negative Factor Analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 1997; 37(1): 23-35. [Crossref]
22. Mazzei F, Lucarelli F, Nava S, Prati P, Valli G, Vecchi R. A New Methodological Approach: The Combined Use of Two-Stage Streakier Samplers and Optical Particle Counters for the Characterization of Airborne Particulate Matter. Atmos Environ. 2007; 41(26): 5525-10. [Crossref]
23. Norris G, Duvall R. EPA Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) 5.0 Fundamentals and User Guide, in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Expo Res Lab Res Triangle Park: Petaluma. 2014; EPA/600/R-14/108: 1-136.
24. Norris GA, Duvall R, Brown SG, Bai S. EPA Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) 5.0 fundamentals and User Guide Prepared for the US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development. Washington, DC. 2014; DC EPA/600/R-14/108.
25. Reff A, Eberly SI, Bhave PV. Receptor Modeling of Ambient Particulate Matter Data Using Positive Matrix Factorization: Review of Existing Methods. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2007; 57(2): 146-54. [Crossref]
26. Brown SG, Eberly S, Paatero P, Norris GA. Methods for Estimating Uncertainty in PMF Solutions: Examples with Ambient Air and Water Quality Data and Guidance on Reporting PMF Results. Sci Total Environ. 2015; 518: 626-35. [Crossref]
27. Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005; EPA/630/P03/001B. Available from: URL: http://earth1.epa.gov/ttn/atw/cancer_guidelines_final_3-25-05.pdf
28. Mansha M, Ghauri B, Rahman S, Amman A. Characterization and Source Apportionment of Ambient Air Particulate Matter (PM2.5) in Karachi. Sci Total Environ. 2012; 425: 176-83. [Crossref]
29. Wang Y, Hopke PK, Xia X, Rattigan OV, Chalupade DC, Utell MJ. Source Apportionment of Airborne Particulate Matter Using Inorganic and Organic Species as Tracers. Atmos Environ. 2012; 55: 525-32. [Crossref]
30. Cohen DD, Crawford J, Stelcer E, Bacet VT. Characterisation and Source Apportionment of Fine Particulate Sources at Hanoi from 2001 to 2008. Atmos Environ. 2010; 44(3): 320-8. [Crossref]
31. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Zanjan Province - Researches Results In Assessing Heavy Metals Status In Some. Agric Lands Prod Zanjan Province. 2014.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Human Environment and Health Promotion

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb