Volume 8, Issue 3 (12-2018)                   PCNM 2018, 8(3): 18-26 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Vaezi A, Sepehri nia M, Shali M. Assessing the quality of receiving patients’ informed consent in the surgical wards of hospitals affiliated to Zanjan University of Medical Sciences. PCNM. 2018; 8 (3) :18-26
URL: http://zums.ac.ir/nmcjournal/article-1-586-en.html
Department of pediatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran , m.sepehrinea@zums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (215 Views)
Background: Informed consent is the cornerstone of medical ethics and is related to four out of ten articles of the patient's legal charter, aimed at supporting the patient and clarifies ethical principles in the physician-patient relationship.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of receiving patients’ informed consent in the surgical wards in Zanjan University of Medical Sciences.
Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, all patients, admitted to surgical wards of public hospitals in Zanjan, were selected through stratified random sampling method. Data were collected after admission and before surgery, using a questionnaire designed according to library studies and considering Sheikh Taheri et al.’s study in two sections: general and specific. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to analyze the results. The content validity method was used to determine the validity, and the reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated by internal reliability using Cronbach's alpha coefficient.
Results: The number of patients was 400 (211 males and 189 females) and their mean age was 33.78. The results showed that 24% of the samples rated as “appropriate” the process of signing the consent form, and 19% of them considered the status of information submission appropriate. Three percent of the respondents regarded the comprehensibility of the questionnaire, and 12% considered the voluntary nature of obtaining the informed consent, as well as 19% found the relationship between the physician and the patient as appropriate. Other findings revealed that there was no significant relationship between sex and marital status with the sum of the questionnaire dimensions, but there was a significant relationship between the type of hospitalization and how to submit information consent and the process of signing the consent form, and also between the number of hospitalizations. Moreover, the type of job was found to be statistically significant with the form signature process variable.
Conclusion: This study found that there were some shortcomings in the process of obtaining a surgical informed consent. Therefore, considering the role of the patient in the process of obtaining informed consent, providing sufficient information on physician’s treatment, training physicians and providing the patient with the opportunity to choose the treatment method can be effective in improving the quality of obtaining an informed consent.
Full-Text [PDF 561 kb]   (97 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Review Articels | Subject: other
Received: 2019/09/3

References
1. 1 Sheikhtaheri A, Sadeqi-Jabali M, Hashemi-Dehaghi Z. Physicians’ Perspectives on Causes of Health Care Errors and Preventive Strategies: A Study in a Developing Country. Iran J Public Health. 2018; 47(5): 720-28.
2. Rampersad K, Chen D, Hariharan S. Efficacy of a separate informed consent for anesthesia services: A prospective study from the Caribbean. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016; 32(1): 18. [Crossref]
3. Singh T, Sharma S, Banerjee B, Garg S. Knowledge regarding anesthesiologist and anesthesiology among patients and attendants attending a rural hospital of New Delhi. J Educ Health Promot. 2018; 7: 12. [Crossref]
4. Cocanour CS. Informed consent-It’s more than a signature on a piece of paper. Am J Surg. 2017; 214(6): 993–75. [Crossref]
5. 5 Tarighat Saber G, Zarei S, Etemadi A, Mohammadi M, Shams G. Assessment Of Knowledge And Satifaction Of Information Given In Cancer Patients Referred To Imam Khomeini Hospital 1382-1383 And Itss Assossiation With Anxiety and Depression In These Patients. Univ Med J. 2006; 64(2): 165–71. [In Persian]
6. Karimi Rozveh A, Nabi Amjad R, Karimi Rozveh J, Rasouli D. Attitudes toward telling the truth to cancer patients in Iran: A review article. Int J Hematol Stem Cell Res. 2017; 11(3): 178–84.
7. .Bottrell MM1, Alpert H, Fischbach RL, Emanuel LL. Hospital informed consent for procedure forms: facilitating quality patient-physician interaction. Arch Surg. 2000 Jan;135(1):26-33. [Crossref]
8. Kabirzadeh A, Delaram A, Abbasi Maryam, Payesteh S Tm. Rate Of Consent Validity In Patients From Teaching Hospitals In Sari. J Maz Univ Med Sci. 2009; 19(96): 62–67. [In Persian]
9. Sheikhtaheri candidate; Farzandipour. Quality of Informed Consent Process and Factors Affecting it among Patients Undergoing Surgery, an Empirical Study in Hospitals of Kashan, Iran. Hakim Health Res J. 2010; 12(4): 33–41. [In Persian]
10. Meysami V, Ebrahimnia M, Isfeedvajani MS, Khalagi K. Quality of receiving patient’s informed consent in the surgical wards of a military hospital in Tehran at 2016 and its improvement solutions. J Mil Med. 2017; 19(5): 513–22.
11. Amini M, Mousavi SMH, Mohammadnezhad SM. Quality of informed Consent Process in patients undergoing in Tehran University of medical sciences’ hospitals. J Med Ethics & Hist. 2009; 2(3): 61-69. [In Persian]
12. San Jose A, San Jose R, Zuza B, Zunzarren F, Luri T. Aspects of pre-operational information of the patient in emergency surgery. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2000; 23(3): 509-16.
13. Howlader MH, Dhanji A-R, Uppal R, Magee P, Wood AJ, Anyanwu AC. Patients’ views of the consent process for adult cardiac surgery: questionnaire survey. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2004; 38(6): 363-68. [Crossref]
14. Castka P, Corbett CJ. Management systems standards: Diffusion, impact and governance of ISO 9000, ISO 14000, and other management standards. Found Trends Technol Inf Oper Manag. 2013;7(3–4):161–379. [Crossref]
15. Shaker SH, Hosseini Kasnavieh SM, Amini M, Tahmasebi A, Soltani S. A Survey of Current Practice of Informed Consent in Iranian Hospitals. Hosp Top. 2018; 96(3): 69-74. [Crossref]
16. Mirbagher Ajorpaz N, Heidari S, Ranjbar N, Afshar M. Assessment Rate of Being Conscious and Quality of Informed Consent Process in Inpatients Undergoing Surgery in Selected Hospitals of Isfahan in 2009. Qom Univ Med Sci J. 2011; 5(3): 53-60. [In Persian]
17. Simon CM, Siminoff LA, Kodish ED, Burant C. Comparison of the Informed Consent Process for Randomized Clinical Trials in Pediatric and Adult Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(13): 2708-17. [Crossref]
18. Lo B. Resolving ethical dilemmas : a guide for clinicians. 6th ed. United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2019; 372.
19. Montazeri A, Vahdani M, Haji-Mahmoodi M, Jarvandi S, Ebrahimi M. Cancer patient education in Iran: a descriptive study. Support Care Cancer. 2002; 10(2): 169-73. [Crossref]
20. Razavi SHE. A two-decade review of medical ethics in Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2009; 38(SUPPL1):40-6.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Preventive Care in Nursing & Midwifery Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb